Sunday, May 16, 2010
Celebrate the me (and you) yet to come
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30589/30589d52f9fe606a20b7d259c751fd073db6b296" alt=""
By Edward Copeland
Last year, they released a remake of Alan Parker's Fame, which opened 30 years ago today. Of course, I didn't bother to see the new version, not only because of my general rule not to see remakes of films that I thought were good in the first place (though I'm sure many will argue with me about Parker's film) but also because the new version had a PG rating, indicating to me that the new Fame would take place in a sanitized world. Parker's Fame did not. (As Roger Ebert opened his review of the remake: Why bother to remake Fame if you don't have a clue why the 1980 movie was special?)
Set in the New York of the late '70s, it was a film for mature teens and adults, earning its R rating with subject matter and without the glossy-eyed "anyone can be a star" attitude that permeates our American Idol-soaked culture of today. Fame emphasized work and the risk of failure, not the chance for easy fame or fluke stardom. Alan Parker's Fame looked at the students of the High School for the Performing Arts with an unblinking eye in a world much closer to what it takes to achieve artistic success than the easy climb reality TV tosses as a lure like a drug pusher offering that first free taste of crack before the user realizes that the saccharine fantasyland dream being sold to them is going to come at a very high price with inevitable lows.
Though not necessarily thought of as one, Fame belonged to that group of films of the late 1970s and early 1980s that treated coming of age tales with respect. The characters sprang from wide ranges of locales and social circles and dissimilar stories (Breaking Away, Saturday Night Fever), even variances in age groups (Over the Edge, Diner, My Bodyguard) and quality (Rich Kids, Foxes). As time went on, these types of films became rarer beasts, degenerating mostly into teen sex comedies such as Porky's or The Last American Virgin or superficial comedies from the John Hughes School of Formula Filmmaking. A few within those groups would break out as great such as Risky Business or Say Anything, but for the most part, they were a rarity and the heyday was over soon after the release of Fame.
Granted, Alan Parker's filmography hardly equals perfection, but it puzzles me how far his star has fallen when so many of his films, in my opinion, are pretty damn good. Looking over the list of his directing efforts, I noticed that most of the ones I remember most fondly link themselves intricately with music: Bugsy Malone, Pink Floyd The Wall, Angel Heart (a great thriller, pumped by Trevor Jones' score), The Commitments and the film we're discussing here, Fame. Even though I'm not that big a fan of Midnight Express, can anyone who has seen it forget its pulsating Giorgio Moroder score? On the other hand, Parker also helmed the bloated bore that was the movie version of the musical Evita.
Since Fame is set at the New York High School for the Performing Arts, the film written by Christopher Gore divides itself into appropriate sections to show progression through the years, assuming the potential students make it in in the first place.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa88/7fa88713847e2aa1772aca30ad4c14f55d873175" alt=""
Following white-on-black credits, the first image we see in Fame is a photo of Laurence Olivier as Shakespeare's Othello before we plunge into the chaos of the countless would-be students trying to gain entry to the prestigious school to hone their crafts in dance, acting or music while learning the academic basics at the same time. For the most part, the actors in the film are auditioning for us as well, since many of the main characters are played by relative newcomers or actually are making their film debuts. Film editor Gerry Hambling and Parker make a great team, building a wonderful rhythm that smoothly moves from one scene to another without the need for clunky transitions; they just glide from sequence to sequence.
What I so enjoyed about Fame the very first time I saw it (and what I generally like about works as different from Parker's film as HBO's late, great The Wire) is that Fame doesn't waste time with exposition scenes introducing us the important characters. In fact, during the audition section, viewers are treated to quite a few scenes of characters trying out for the school that we will never see again. The moviegoer just has to watch and learn as the film goes on which students will be pivotal.
Not only is this an approach I appreciate as a film or TV watcher, it also provides some of the funniest moments as when a potential drama student stumbles his way through Shakespeare, unaware that he's
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d1061/d10615eb28571e05017e106e179822f8188f0a46" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f729d/f729da9075b381457349e94fcb8054681644663a" alt=""
It's funny that watching it now it should remind me of events from my own life, even though I never attended an arts high school, because even when I saw Fame the first time on cable around 1981 or 1982, it spoke to me, almost as if it were foreshadowing. Perhaps that's part of its appeal to me that remains lost on so many others: I recognized parts of it as things that would eventually occur in my life, even though it had to have been on a subconscious level. That didn't mean I knew or would know specifically a Coco (Irene Cara) or a Doris (Maureen Teefy); a Ralph (the superb Barry Miller) or a Bruno (Lee Curreri); a Leroy (Gene Anthony Ray) or a Hilary (Antonia Franceschi); a Lisa (Laura Dean) or a Montgomery (McCrane, whom ER fans will find delightful beneath his huge, bright red afro). Aspects of them may pop up in people in my life, but it was more the atmosphere that seemed familiar to a kid in junior high, even though I'd never been to New York City, never tried to fake tap shoes by attaching Pepsi bottle caps to the bottom of my tennis shoes or been convinced that I could replace an orchestra with the right assortment of keyboards and electronic equipment.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f4fa/2f4faee227b0c645086a161802684732c31dbf9d" alt=""
As the first school year begins to the strains of my favorite song from the soundtrack, "Dogs in the Yard," not only do we get to know the central students better, we also receiver tighter focus on the school's teachers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c9c7/6c9c77ea19a2aebfe39f869e1648bb068d111def" alt=""
Shepherding the would-be actors is Mr. Farrell (Jim Moody) who explains to his students from the outset what they are about to get into as "an underprivileged minority who are going to suffer for their craft" and he doesn't sugarcoat the fact that most actors are not working actors. One thing that is nice is that despite the
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/314fa/314fa0cac67cb672f7ec7dc6ab00d75330563df8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f96af/f96af350f07cb6dcbc9e40788fa66cee8cc94fbd" alt=""
Teaching the musicians is the great Albert Hague as Shorofsky and most of his conflicts come with Bruno, who resents the idea of having to learn actual instruments. Bruno also has a strong booster in his cab driver father (Eddie Barth), who plays Bruno's compositions for his passengers and spends a fortune on his equipment. When he and and his brother drag the equipment into the high school, the brother asks why Bruno couldn't play a simple instrument like their father played the accordion. "My son's head is in the future," Barth replies, "and dad could never play the accordion." During one classroom exchange, as Bruno struggles to make music come out of a violin, he tries to make the case to Shorofsky that his ways are old fashioned and that if Mozart were alive, he'd be composing music more like Bruno is. "What about an orchestra?" the teacher asks. "Who needs an orchestra?" Bruno replies, explaining that his equipment can ape all the appropriate instruments and he could perform any work all by himself. "That's not music, it's masturbation," Shorofsky responds.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/233be/233bef5a229637dcaddecffebbf702e71a2941e8" alt=""
One thing all the craft teachers agree on, in a well-edited sequence, is that the art they teach is the most difficult, be it acting, music or dance. Still, the kids also have academics to deal with and the teacher who symbolizes that aspect is Mrs. Sherwood (Anne Meara, giving the best performance she's ever given on screen and a rare dramatic one). She butts heads early and often with Leroy, who tries to hide the fact that he is illiterate. It is one of the film's weaknesses that they are still having this battle by senior year, by which time you'd expect Leroy would have been flunked out no matter how great a dancer he is, but that's not addressed. However, Meara soars so high that I'll let it slide.
Among the students, the one who is the most anxious for stardom and who views the school as merely a stepping stone to her inevitable rise to the top is Coco. She gets a reluctant Bruno to aid her by writing songs for her to sing, particularly after one impromptu lunch jam session that again as a young teen seemed to predict scenes from my future when myself and other bored teens would sit around various schools' gathering areas singing and dancing and awaiting results from drama contests in high school. What once played as something that I longed to be a part of, later reminded me of my current life and now drips in nostalgia for days long gone and friends very much missed. Sometimes reactions such as that trump any criticism you might have: a film strikes too many familiar chords for you to be able to distance yourself from it, especially when you fell for it at a young age.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/960e7/960e70093984a2ebb5e096d6689005fad627ed99" alt=""
As the students begin their second year, Mr. Farrell tells his drama students that their sophomore year will move them from simple observation to emotional states and the characters themselves begin to show more of this themselves, both in and out of class. Doris frets when Farrell assigns them to discuss one of their most
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5173/e51732e5a32bd4f9963697c6c48e65ef38eaadeb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4ab0/d4ab0d52aa08d71e55a19190e8276fa3fdd8706a" alt=""
The two main girls on the dance track are facing quite different futures. Lisa continues to be more interested in being a chatterbox in class and, much to Miss Berg's chagrin, never seems to even work up a sweat. The teacher finally has enough and despite the girl's pleas, tells her it's time of her to go because she doesn't have the discipline to make it as a dancer. The story for Hilary is turning out quite different. She may come from wealth, but she lives for the craft and it shows, particularly in a lovely sequence where Leroy spies her practicing by herself and the street tough find himself wowed by her grace (and her body doesn't hurt either). Hilary returns the attraction and, always eager to shock her rich WASP parents, brings Leroy home with her "to study" just to see their jaws drop.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4a22f/4a22fc3f562b76d08678a0c730ec62a8b4eebf42" alt=""
The second school year also brings us perhaps the film's most famous sequence, the one containing the film's Oscar-winning title song. It begins as Bruno's leading supporter, his father, parks his cab in front of the school, hooks up loud speakers and blasts the song "Fame," a composition in the movie's universe that Bruno composed using Coco's vocals. Coco couldn't be more thrilled. Bruno wants to hide away somewhere, he's so embarrassed. Everyone else just wants to dance in the streets, which they do, often on top of angry New Yorkers' cars, sparking a small scale riot over the traffic jam session. It's also an illustration of the universe where Fame resides, the old New York City, when it was grittier and scarier, before Times Square became the Disneyfied place it is today.
From this point on in the film, Parker and the Oscar-nominated screenplay by Christopher Gore does make what I think is their most serious mistake. Not that the remainder of the movie isn't good, it's just that from this point on, the school is largely forgotten. In this section in fact, there isn't a single scene involving the classroom at all. That's fine because the students' characters and stories continue to evolve, but it seems to undermine the movie's central premise at the same time. Early on, we do get one scene that takes place within the confines of the school where Coco sings the film's other Oscar-nominated song, the lovely "Out Here on My Own," (also written by Michael Gore with lyrics by Lesley Gore of "It's My Party" fame) which frankly I think is a vastly superior composition to "Fame" which won. Coco plays the piano as Bruno watches approvingly. I think this clip more that backs up my point.
We also begin to learn more why Ralph wants to escape his home life so badly as basically he is the surrogate father for his younger sisters as his unseen mother goes through husbands. Despite her initial animosity
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/401e7/401e7d84f531fc543828f27c0a896f7684702f1b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/60e86/60e860f0f12236b55e440f82f49e48012e9bc90c" alt=""
The Ralph-Doris romance also introduced me to another phenomenon that was unfamiliar to me but which would later become a large part of my high school life, especially after returning from drama contests: The
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00949/009495fed561cdfb7fc985249005436b3687e627" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba5e7/ba5e721551f4e18bbe62e6a06063651202c99377" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f431f/f431f36034e2a5e8aa36cf5f51c15cecb401ec7f" alt=""
For the most part, the senior year section also stays away from the classroom to look at what's happening to the students' lives outside of school, but I'm going to refrain from discussing too much of what happens to
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a21ef/a21ef83f6a8c6b494bb7880c1d6c228a48071be1" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6da7/c6da71332d1ad5287a5319d7f2fb7677bc858096" alt=""
The one character who does get a brief taste of success (and failure) in this section is Ralph, who finally lives up to his Freddie Prinze dreams by getting a chance at standup (introduced by a young Richard Belzer) and
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9fcc4/9fcc450ff9c58c80f6cc6147f59950d7a875c0a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e794f/e794f59aa899a9ed5f1478b73c9478cf1caebf95" alt=""
Now, as I've been honest in saying, Fame strikes too close to me in many ways for me to look at it with completely objective vision and, as a critic, it's not my job to be objective anyway. Any opinion will inevitably prove subjective, be it based on personal factors or just the way a person judges films. However, all critics (professionals, amateurs and those in between) or plain old moviegoers can't always turn those feelings off but if we do our jobs well and right, readers should be able to recognize the biases that figure into our opinions. My God, does anyone really believe that the late great Pauline Kael loved ALL those De Palma films? However, though I do think the animosity against both Alan Parker and the original Fame are overstated, re-watching it made me aware of the one thing it needed to take it from being a very good movie to becoming a true masterpiece: With its multiple characters, unusual structure and characters and stories that go unresolved, this may be an Alan Parker film, but inside a Robert Altman film is trying to break out.
Tweet
Labels: 80s, A. Parker, Altman, C. Sheen, De Palma, Ebert, Gregory Peck, HBO, John Hughes, K. Hepburn, Kael, Movie Tributes, Musicals, Oliver Stone, Olivier, Remakes, Shakespeare, The Wire, Theater, Tracy
Comments:
<< Home
I have to be honest--I'm not a fan of Fame, and I think it's because I've always seen it (as you mention in your review) as an "afterschool special." But your review of the movie is simply splendid, and does what any good review should do--force the reader to look at what's been examined with a fresh perspective.
I will admit that I developed a crush on Maureen Teefy when this film came out...but the only other movies I ever saw her in were Grease 2 (with the Jackie O hat) and Supergirl.
I will admit that I developed a crush on Maureen Teefy when this film came out...but the only other movies I ever saw her in were Grease 2 (with the Jackie O hat) and Supergirl.
i went to drama school because of fame - i was a doris who morphed into a montgomery and ended up a lisa (but wanted to be a leroy - bodywise, not reading level-wise)
i'm still amazed that the cast list reads like a 'whatever happened to' special - i was so sure irene cara and maureen teefy were going to be huge
i find plenty of faults with the film now, but every single time i watch it a big part of me reverts to that 17 year old who wanted to live forever...
i'm still amazed that the cast list reads like a 'whatever happened to' special - i was so sure irene cara and maureen teefy were going to be huge
i find plenty of faults with the film now, but every single time i watch it a big part of me reverts to that 17 year old who wanted to live forever...
Even though they have some major differences in terms of content, Fame has always struck me as the kind of film that the cinematic incarnation of A Chorus Line could and should have been. Fame is a film with some obvious deficiencies - many of the performances are amateurish, while certain aspects of the story feel contrived (the gaps in logic don't bother me as much as how melodramatic some of the plot devices are). The reason the film works so well, in spite of its limitations, is that it ultimately feels like a accurate and honest reflection of the world in which it's set. Impromptu musical numbers notwithstanding, Alan Parker isn't trying to fashion some kind of cheerfully sanitized, storybook version of New York City, or an oversimplified Breakfast Club-type fascimile of teenage life. This is the way New York looks and sounds, and this is the way members of the performing arts subculture - actors, dancers, musicians - think, interact and develop. It's a stylized film, but it speaks to the truth of who its subjects are, with an authentic feel for the world in which they live. That's why Fame holds up in a way that so many other similar-themed movies don't - and why A Chorus Line doesn't hold up at all.
Post a Comment
<< Home